Signature Tower!

William Williams’ article in the City Paper today points out that several nationwide urban design forums are abuzz with news of the new Signature Tower announcement.

Apparently, the 1,000+ foot tower’s mixed hotel and residential use might even classify it as the tallest residential building in the U.S.

Personally, I think it will add tremendous character to the skyline.

Rendering of the Signature Tower in the Nashville skyline

7 Comments so far

  1. S-townMike (unregistered) on May 2nd, 2006 @ 3:09 pm

    The urban planning community has been buzzing about Signature Tower since Tony Giarrartana introduced the plans last August. Urbanplanet.org (to which Williams refers in the City Paper piece) has likewise been a flurry of discussion for as many months. The picture posted above comes from a February discussion thread on Urbanplanet.org. The continuing publicity helps the project, but William Williams seems to be just catching up to the news.

    Here are some other mock-ups of the Tower at the Giarratana website.

  2. Jim (unregistered) on May 3rd, 2006 @ 7:19 am

    I find this exciting but at the time time I’m a little nostalgic for the days when the L&C Tower was the tallest building.

  3. S-townMike (unregistered) on May 3rd, 2006 @ 12:29 pm

    According to a commenter connected with SigTower, the skyscraper has a new design that has not gone public yet.

  4. S-townMike (unregistered) on May 3rd, 2006 @ 12:31 pm

    We need to coin a nickname for it. How about “SigTow” or as above, “SigTower”?

  5. S-townMike (unregistered) on May 3rd, 2006 @ 12:36 pm

    Sorry for multiple posts. But this morning’s Tennessean has an article saying that Giarratana is in talks with a luxury “boutique” hotel corporation to lure them to some of the bottom floors (above the retail space). Also, he is adding 10 more stories to the original plan to make the behemoth 1,047 feet.

    The Tennessean seems much more ahead of the curve on this development than the City Paper’s William Williams.

  6. David Ortiz (unregistered) on May 8th, 2006 @ 12:20 pm

    I don’t know that “character” is a word I’d use for this building. “Height,” maybe. But really, this is like, the pinnacle of architecture circa 1975. Blech.

  7. Kate O' (unregistered) on May 8th, 2006 @ 12:28 pm

    Hey, it’s prettier than the Sears Tower. Through all my years in Chicago, I always marveled at how ugly that bizarre thing is.


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2008 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.